First look at your story, just describe what you see. Who or what is portrayed, what is happening? The title of this painting may be convenient, particularly regarding Dali.
What appears to be important for the artist – expression or representation?
Notice the feelings that you get taking a look at the painting, the overall impression made by the whole painting, and its components – after you'll dig deeper to know what motivated these feelings. There's a reason why you prefer one painting over another. If you are looking for abstract cityscape artist London UK then you can search online.
Collect info about the artist and the historic background. To examine"Guernica" by Picasso, you have to understand that Guernica is a city demolished from the Nazis, and you need to read up about the critical characteristics of cubism.
To translate the picture of kissing individuals covered by a sheet of fabric in Magritte’s “The Lovers", anything you imagine by taking a look at the painting falls flat when you are aware that the artist's mommy got drowned in the river, and if discovered, a bit of fabric was wrapped around her mind. Thus, don't rely upon your abilities and flavor too much, you will find things that you want to learn about before you begin making assumptions.
The historic background of these paintings itself is vital. What experiments was that he involved with? What was the painting perceived with the contemporaries? Malevich began suprematism for development on abstractionism, putting out the brand new artistic concept of the color, the shape, and the composition of this painting. The rough raw and lines colors in the fauvist paintings could be tracked right back to Van Gogh. Do you believe there's something brand new implied in the painting you're considering, or is there anything whatsoever identifying about it?